oracle hyperion performance scorecard

The successor to Hyperion Performance Scorecard (HPS) is Oracle Scorecard and Strategy Management (OSSM) which is a piece of the Oracle BI Foundation Suite (BIFS). This upgrade works really well with existing scorecard applications, it initiates well and also map objectives aligned with the business strategy of an organization. This service manages all areas of development and testing and coordinates the deployment into production.

Hyperion Scorecard is dead (in fact despite everything it exists in the most recent 11.1.x discharges yet the item is reawakened as Oracle Scorecard and Strategy Management) and is coming to, in the event that it hasn’t as of now, end-of-life backing from Oracle. Clients of Hyperion Scorecard are expected for a redesign. OSSM is the answer. In comparison, OSSM can do essentially everything that Hyperion Scorecard could improve; In addition, it can do an a great deal moreOSSM provides more robust features than the legacy Hyperion Performance Scorecard application with more features for multiple user interaction, report distribution, robust Key Performance Indicator, accountability, and flexible alignment to leading Scorecard methodologies such as the Balanced Scorecard. Many organization working on Hyperion performance Scorecard applications should update to Oracle Scorecard and Strategy Management.

OBIEE RPD, or metadata layer, is a main thrust behind OSSM, much the same as it is for Answers. KPI items are manufactured utilizing sections uncovered through a branch of knowledge from OBIEE’s RPD document, where the KPI’s “genuine” quality can indicate one segment and its “objective” worth can indicate another. Numerous KPIs are then added to a Scorecard item, where they can be gathered into targets and stuck to different measurements they identify with. From that point, a Scorecard item can contain any number of Scorecard Documents, or perspectives, that present the KPIs on the Scorecard in some graphical design.

To sum up with, OSSM has a wonderful future in the OBIEE stack. While each OBIEE customer should consider how they can use it to drive execution in their affiliation, a few associations aren’t set up for the control required to make them go. Instead of put OSSM on the rack to assemble dust, BI planners should impact its skilled dissents, components, and viewpoints to enhance normal dashboards, save profitable progression time, and pass on testing essentials.